Match statistics snapshot
- Wolves created the clearer chances on xG (1.96 vs 1.68, Δ 0.28).
- Chelsea fired more attempts (14 vs 12 shots).
- Chelsea was more accurate in front of goal (57% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Wolves | Statistic | Chelsea |
|---|---|---|
| 1.96Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.68 |
| 3 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 8Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 14Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Wolves | Statistic | Chelsea |
|---|---|---|
| 40% | Ball possession | 60%Lead |
| 79% | Pass accuracy | 86%Lead |
| 253 | Accurate passes | 426Lead |
| 320 | Total passes | 495Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Wolves | Statistic | Chelsea |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Wolves | Statistic | Chelsea |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| -1.23 | Goals prevented | -1.23 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Wolves | Statistic | Chelsea |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |