Match statistics snapshot
- Chelsea created the clearer chances on xG (1.68 vs 2.04, Δ 0.36).
- Wolves fired more attempts (15 vs 11 shots).
- Chelsea was more accurate in front of goal (36% on target vs 27%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Wolves | Statistic | Chelsea |
|---|---|---|
| 1.68 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.04Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 7 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Wolves | Statistic | Chelsea |
|---|---|---|
| 40% | Ball possession | 60%Lead |
| 76% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
| 275 | Accurate passes | 462Lead |
| 364 | Total passes | 549Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Wolves | Statistic | Chelsea |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Wolves | Statistic | Chelsea |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 1Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Wolves | Statistic | Chelsea |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 3Lead | Yellow cards | 6 |
Statistics is not available yet.