Match statistics snapshot
- Chelsea created the clearer chances on xG (1.06 vs 3.44, Δ 2.38).
- Chelsea fired more attempts (15 vs 11 shots).
- Chelsea was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 27%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Wolves | Statistic | Chelsea |
|---|---|---|
| 1.06 | Expected goals (xG) | 3.44Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 9 | Shots inside the box | 11Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Wolves | Statistic | Chelsea |
|---|---|---|
| 34% | Ball possession | 66%Lead |
| 84% | Pass accuracy | 93%Lead |
| 307 | Accurate passes | 694Lead |
| 365 | Total passes | 747Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Wolves | Statistic | Chelsea |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Wolves | Statistic | Chelsea |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| -0.30 | Goals prevented | -0.30 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Wolves | Statistic | Chelsea |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 10 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |