Match statistics snapshot
- Crystal Palace created the clearer chances on xG (1.57 vs 2.70, Δ 1.13).
- Wolves fired more attempts (14 vs 13 shots).
- Wolves was more accurate in front of goal (57% on target vs 23%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Wolves | Statistic | Crystal Palace |
|---|---|---|
| 1.57 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.70Lead |
| 3Lead | Offsides | 5 |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 13 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Wolves | Statistic | Crystal Palace |
|---|---|---|
| 62%Lead | Ball possession | 38% |
| 83%Lead | Pass accuracy | 73% |
| 451Lead | Accurate passes | 253 |
| 545Lead | Total passes | 345 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Wolves | Statistic | Crystal Palace |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Wolves | Statistic | Crystal Palace |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 7Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Wolves | Statistic | Crystal Palace |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 3Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |