Match statistics snapshot
- Crystal Palace created the clearer chances on xG (1.53 vs 2.51, Δ 0.98).
- Crystal Palace fired more attempts (19 vs 11 shots).
- Wolves was more accurate in front of goal (55% on target vs 37%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Wolves | Statistic | Crystal Palace |
|---|---|---|
| 1.53 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.51Lead |
| 4 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 17Lead |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 6 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 19Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Wolves | Statistic | Crystal Palace |
|---|---|---|
| 57%Lead | Ball possession | 43% |
| 80%Lead | Pass accuracy | 76% |
| 389Lead | Accurate passes | 272 |
| 484Lead | Total passes | 357 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Wolves | Statistic | Crystal Palace |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Wolves | Statistic | Crystal Palace |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
| -0.26 | Goals prevented | -0.26 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Wolves | Statistic | Crystal Palace |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 9 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |