Match statistics snapshot
- Wolves created the clearer chances on xG (1.79 vs 1.27, Δ 0.52).
- Crystal Palace fired more attempts (10 vs 8 shots).
- Crystal Palace was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 13%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Wolves | Statistic | Crystal Palace |
|---|---|---|
| 1.79Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.27 |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 6Lead |
| 5Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 1 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 10Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Wolves | Statistic | Crystal Palace |
|---|---|---|
| 48% | Ball possession | 52%Lead |
| 81% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 330 | Accurate passes | 364Lead |
| 408 | Total passes | 437Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Wolves | Statistic | Crystal Palace |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Wolves | Statistic | Crystal Palace |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| 0.08 | Goals prevented | 0.08 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Wolves | Statistic | Crystal Palace |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |