Match statistics snapshot
- Wolves created the clearer chances on xG (1.27 vs 1.20, Δ 0.07).
- Wolves fired more attempts (16 vs 10 shots).
- Ipswich was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 38%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Wolves | Statistic | Ipswich |
|---|---|---|
| 1.27Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.20 |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Wolves | Statistic | Ipswich |
|---|---|---|
| 54%Lead | Ball possession | 46% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 83% |
| 418Lead | Accurate passes | 350 |
| 499Lead | Total passes | 420 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Wolves | Statistic | Ipswich |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Wolves | Statistic | Ipswich |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| 0.46 | Goals prevented | 0.46 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Wolves | Statistic | Ipswich |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |