Match statistics snapshot
- Wolves fired more attempts (11 vs 7 shots).
- Liverpool was more accurate in front of goal (29% on target vs 18%).
- Wolves held more of the ball (58% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Wolves | Statistic | Liverpool |
|---|---|---|
2Lead | OffsidesTiming of runs — high counts can mean aggressive lines. | 5 |
8Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
5 | Shots off target | 5 |
2 | Shots on target | 2 |
3 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
11Lead | Total shotsAll attempts including blocked and off-target. | 7 |
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Wolves | Statistic | Liverpool |
|---|---|---|
58%Lead | Ball possession | 42% |
85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 79% |
516Lead | Accurate passes | 351 |
604Lead | Total passes | 447 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Wolves | Statistic | Liverpool |
|---|---|---|
4Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Wolves | Statistic | Liverpool |
|---|---|---|
4Lead | Blocked shotsDefensive actions — also counts as part of attacking pressure faced. | 0 |
1 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Wolves | Statistic | Liverpool |
|---|---|---|
10Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Scouting-style duels — each row compares both teams, shows share of the pie, and who had the edge. Categories summarize who won more signals.
How clinical and dangerous each attack was — not just how often they shot, but where and how good those chances were.
Liverpool leads shot accuracy (+57% vs Wolves)
Liverpool leads shot accuracy (+57% vs Wolves)
Wolves leads box penetration (+70% vs Liverpool)
Playing style signals: whether chances came from patient possession or direct vertical play.
Wolves leads this block
Liverpool — slower buildup (more passes per shot)
Liverpool — slower buildup (more passes per shot)
Territorial dominance built from box presence, set pieces, and sustained threat.
Wolves leads this block
Wolves leads territorial pressure (+160% vs Liverpool)
Wolves leads territorial pressure (+160% vs Liverpool)
Archetype ratings you can map to card modifiers, AI behaviour, or match narratives.
Wolves leads this block
Wolves had the edge in 3 of 4 signals in this block.
Liverpool leads (17.0 vs 12.0).
Wolves leads (49.3 vs 33.2).
Wolves leads (12.0 vs 5.0).
Wolves leads (15.0 vs 14.0).