Match statistics snapshot
- Wolves created the clearer chances on xG (2.03 vs 1.96, Δ 0.07).
- Liverpool fired more attempts (22 vs 12 shots).
- Wolves was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 18%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Wolves | Statistic | Liverpool |
|---|---|---|
| 2.03Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.96 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 12Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 8Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 10Lead |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 22Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Wolves | Statistic | Liverpool |
|---|---|---|
| 42% | Ball possession | 58%Lead |
| 75% | Pass accuracy | 85%Lead |
| 305 | Accurate passes | 465Lead |
| 407 | Total passes | 544Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Wolves | Statistic | Liverpool |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Wolves | Statistic | Liverpool |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 10Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Wolves | Statistic | Liverpool |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | Fouls | 7Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |