Match statistics snapshot
- Liverpool created the clearer chances on xG (0.63 vs 2.52, Δ 1.89).
- Liverpool fired more attempts (16 vs 11 shots).
- Liverpool was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 18%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Wolves | Statistic | Liverpool |
|---|---|---|
| 0.63 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.52Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 11Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Wolves | Statistic | Liverpool |
|---|---|---|
| 34% | Ball possession | 66%Lead |
| 81% | Pass accuracy | 88%Lead |
| 296 | Accurate passes | 638Lead |
| 367 | Total passes | 729Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Wolves | Statistic | Liverpool |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Wolves | Statistic | Liverpool |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Wolves | Statistic | Liverpool |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | Fouls | 4Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |