Match statistics snapshot
- Liverpool created the clearer chances on xG (0.63 vs 2.54, Δ 1.91).
- Liverpool fired more attempts (10 vs 8 shots).
- Liverpool was more accurate in front of goal (60% on target vs 38%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Wolves | Statistic | Liverpool |
|---|---|---|
| 0.63 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.54Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 3Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 10Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Wolves | Statistic | Liverpool |
|---|---|---|
| 45% | Ball possession | 55%Lead |
| 84% | Pass accuracy | 85%Lead |
| 357 | Accurate passes | 455Lead |
| 426 | Total passes | 534Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Wolves | Statistic | Liverpool |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 10Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Wolves | Statistic | Liverpool |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| 0.12 | Goals prevented | 0.12 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Wolves | Statistic | Liverpool |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |