Match statistics snapshot
- Manchester City created the clearer chances on xG (0.47 vs 0.87, Δ 0.40).
- Manchester City fired more attempts (23 vs 3 shots).
- Manchester City held more of the ball (68% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Wolves | Statistic | Manchester City |
|---|---|---|
| 0.47 | Expected goals (xG) | 0.87Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 12Lead |
| 0 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 1 | Shots on target | 8Lead |
|---|
| 0 | Shots outside the box | 11Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Total shots | 23Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Wolves | Statistic | Manchester City |
|---|---|---|
| 32% | Ball possession | 68%Lead |
| 76% | Pass accuracy | 88%Lead |
| 215 | Accurate passes | 526Lead |
| 282 | Total passes | 597Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Wolves | Statistic | Manchester City |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Wolves | Statistic | Manchester City |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 10Lead |
| 7Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Wolves | Statistic | Manchester City |
|---|---|---|
| 18 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 5 | Yellow cards | 4Lead |