Match statistics snapshot
- Manchester City created the clearer chances on xG (0.97 vs 1.62, Δ 0.65).
- Manchester City fired more attempts (22 vs 3 shots).
- Wolves was more accurate in front of goal (67% on target vs 32%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Wolves | Statistic | Manchester City |
|---|---|---|
| 0.97 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.62Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 2 | Shots inside the box | 12Lead |
| 1 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 2 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 10Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Total shots | 22Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Wolves | Statistic | Manchester City |
|---|---|---|
| 22% | Ball possession | 78%Lead |
| 66% | Pass accuracy | 90%Lead |
| 143 | Accurate passes | 657Lead |
| 216 | Total passes | 731Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Wolves | Statistic | Manchester City |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 18Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Wolves | Statistic | Manchester City |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 8Lead |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| 0.32 | Goals prevented | 0.32 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Wolves | Statistic | Manchester City |
|---|---|---|
| 8 | Fouls | 5Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.