Match statistics snapshot
- Wolves fired more attempts (13 vs 8 shots).
- Nottingham Forest was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 38%).
- Nottingham Forest held more of the ball (59% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Wolves | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 6Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots off target | 2 |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Wolves | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 41% | Ball possession | 59%Lead |
| 70% | Pass accuracy | 78%Lead |
| 274 | Accurate passes | 443Lead |
| 390 | Total passes | 569Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Wolves | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Wolves | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Wolves | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 6Lead |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |