Match statistics snapshot
- Wolves fired more attempts (6 vs 5 shots).
- Nottingham Forest was more accurate in front of goal (80% on target vs 17%).
- Wolves held more of the ball (63% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Wolves | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 4Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 5Lead | Shots off target | 0 |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 4Lead |
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Total shots | 5 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Wolves | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 63%Lead | Ball possession | 37% |
| 83%Lead | Pass accuracy | 70% |
| 451Lead | Accurate passes | 225 |
| 545Lead | Total passes | 321 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Wolves | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Wolves | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 1Lead |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Wolves | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 7Lead |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |