Match statistics snapshot
- Nottingham Forest created the clearer chances on xG (1.17 vs 1.29, Δ 0.12).
- Wolves fired more attempts (10 vs 8 shots).
- Wolves was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Wolves | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 1.17 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.29Lead |
| 3 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 3Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 10Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Wolves | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 68%Lead | Ball possession | 32% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 68% |
| 555Lead | Accurate passes | 210 |
| 655Lead | Total passes | 307 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Wolves | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Wolves | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Wolves | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |