Match statistics snapshot
- Nottingham Forest created the clearer chances on xG (1.59 vs 2.13, Δ 0.54).
- Wolves fired more attempts (13 vs 11 shots).
- Wolves was more accurate in front of goal (46% on target vs 27%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Wolves | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 1.59 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.13Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Wolves | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 61%Lead | Ball possession | 39% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 79% |
| 466Lead | Accurate passes | 286 |
| 549Lead | Total passes | 361 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Wolves | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Wolves | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| 0 | Goals prevented | 0 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Wolves | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |