Match statistics snapshot
- Wolves created the clearer chances on xG (0.91 vs 0.74, Δ 0.17).
- Nottingham Forest fired more attempts (10 vs 5 shots).
- Nottingham Forest was more accurate in front of goal (30% on target vs 20%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Wolves | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 0.91Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.74 |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 7Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3Lead |
| 1 | Shots on target | 3Lead |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 3Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Total shots | 10Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Wolves | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 50% | Ball possession | 50% |
| 79% | Pass accuracy | 80%Lead |
| 329 | Accurate passes | 334Lead |
| 415 | Total passes | 416Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Wolves | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 9Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Wolves | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| 0.14 | Goals prevented | 0.14 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Wolves | Statistic | Nottingham Forest |
|---|---|---|
| 19 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |