Match statistics snapshot
- Wolves fired more attempts (14 vs 9 shots).
- Wolves was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 11%).
- Reading held more of the ball (66% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Wolves | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| 7Lead | Shots off target | 5 |
| 7 |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Wolves | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 34% | Ball possession | 66%Lead |
| 71% | Pass accuracy | 85%Lead |
| 222 | Accurate passes | 518Lead |
| 311 | Total passes | 610Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Wolves | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Wolves | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Wolves | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 10 |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |