Match statistics snapshot
- Reading fired more attempts (13 vs 6 shots).
- Wolves was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 38%).
- Reading held more of the ball (54% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Wolves | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 6Lead |
| 2 | Shots off target | 8Lead |
| 3 |
| 5Lead |
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 6 | Total shots | 13Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Wolves | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 46% | Ball possession | 54%Lead |
| 84% | Pass accuracy | 87%Lead |
| 405 | Accurate passes | 475Lead |
| 482 | Total passes | 548Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Wolves | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Wolves | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 1Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Wolves | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Fouls | 7 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |