Match statistics snapshot
- Rotherham fired more attempts (12 vs 9 shots).
- Wolves was more accurate in front of goal (56% on target vs 17%).
- Wolves held more of the ball (60% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Wolves | Statistic | Rotherham |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 3 | Shots off target | 8Lead |
| 5Lead |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 12Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Wolves | Statistic | Rotherham |
|---|---|---|
| 60%Lead | Ball possession | 40% |
| 71%Lead | Pass accuracy | 55% |
| 337Lead | Accurate passes | 168 |
| 473Lead | Total passes | 303 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Wolves | Statistic | Rotherham |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Wolves | Statistic | Rotherham |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 2Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Wolves | Statistic | Rotherham |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |