Match statistics snapshot
- Wolves created the clearer chances on xG (1.26 vs 0.66, Δ 0.60).
- Southampton fired more attempts (9 vs 8 shots).
- Wolves was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Wolves | Statistic | Southampton |
|---|---|---|
| 1.26Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.66 |
| 3 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 5Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 0 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 9Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Wolves | Statistic | Southampton |
|---|---|---|
| 29% | Ball possession | 71%Lead |
| 77% | Pass accuracy | 90%Lead |
| 213 | Accurate passes | 606Lead |
| 278 | Total passes | 673Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Wolves | Statistic | Southampton |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 9Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Wolves | Statistic | Southampton |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
| 0 | Goals prevented | 0 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Wolves | Statistic | Southampton |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |