Match statistics snapshot
- Tottenham created the clearer chances on xG (0.52 vs 1.20, Δ 0.68).
- Tottenham fired more attempts (21 vs 8 shots).
- Wolves was more accurate in front of goal (63% on target vs 29%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Wolves | Statistic | Tottenham |
|---|---|---|
| 0.52 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.20Lead |
| 3 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 7Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 5 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 14Lead |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 21Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Wolves | Statistic | Tottenham |
|---|---|---|
| 47% | Ball possession | 53%Lead |
| 81% | Pass accuracy | 86%Lead |
| 343 | Accurate passes | 406Lead |
| 421 | Total passes | 473Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Wolves | Statistic | Tottenham |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Wolves | Statistic | Tottenham |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 9Lead |
| 6Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Wolves | Statistic | Tottenham |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 18 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |