Match statistics snapshot
- Wolves created the clearer chances on xG (2.15 vs 0.70, Δ 1.45).
- Wolves fired more attempts (17 vs 6 shots).
- Tottenham was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 24%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Wolves | Statistic | Tottenham |
|---|---|---|
| 2.15Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.70 |
| 4 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Wolves | Statistic | Tottenham |
|---|---|---|
| 42% | Ball possession | 58%Lead |
| 85% | Pass accuracy | 88%Lead |
| 364 | Accurate passes | 551Lead |
| 430 | Total passes | 628Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Wolves | Statistic | Tottenham |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Wolves | Statistic | Tottenham |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Wolves | Statistic | Tottenham |
|---|---|---|
| 19 | Fouls | 15Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 3Lead |