Match statistics snapshot
- Wolves created the clearer chances on xG (1.47 vs 1.16, Δ 0.31).
- Wolves fired more attempts (14 vs 11 shots).
- Wolves was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 36%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Wolves | Statistic | West Ham |
|---|---|---|
| 1.47Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.16 |
| 3 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 5Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 10Lead | Shots outside the box | 6 |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Wolves | Statistic | West Ham |
|---|---|---|
| 58%Lead | Ball possession | 42% |
| 87%Lead | Pass accuracy | 84% |
| 518Lead | Accurate passes | 349 |
| 595Lead | Total passes | 414 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Wolves | Statistic | West Ham |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Wolves | Statistic | West Ham |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Wolves | Statistic | West Ham |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 7Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 5 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |