Match statistics snapshot
- West Ham created the clearer chances on xG (1.18 vs 1.34, Δ 0.16).
- West Ham fired more attempts (10 vs 9 shots).
- Wolves was more accurate in front of goal (22% on target vs 10%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Wolves | Statistic | West Ham |
|---|---|---|
| 1.18 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.34Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 2Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 10Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Wolves | Statistic | West Ham |
|---|---|---|
| 41% | Ball possession | 59%Lead |
| 81% | Pass accuracy | 85%Lead |
| 328 | Accurate passes | 488Lead |
| 406 | Total passes | 572Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Wolves | Statistic | West Ham |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 2Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Wolves | Statistic | West Ham |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 2Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| -0.31 | Goals prevented | -0.31 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Wolves | Statistic | West Ham |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |