Match statistics snapshot
- Wolves created the clearer chances on xG (1.87 vs 0.25, Δ 1.62).
- Wolves fired more attempts (11 vs 6 shots).
- Wolves was more accurate in front of goal (73% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Wolves | Statistic | West Ham |
|---|---|---|
| 1.87Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.25 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 0 |
|---|
| 3Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 11Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Wolves | Statistic | West Ham |
|---|---|---|
| 33% | Ball possession | 67%Lead |
| 78% | Pass accuracy | 88%Lead |
| 234 | Accurate passes | 546Lead |
| 301 | Total passes | 624Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Wolves | Statistic | West Ham |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Wolves | Statistic | West Ham |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| -0.86 | Goals prevented | -0.86 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Wolves | Statistic | West Ham |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.