Match statistics snapshot
- AFC Wimbledon fired more attempts (17 vs 10 shots).
- Wrexham was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 6%).
- AFC Wimbledon held more of the ball (53% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Wrexham | Statistic | Afc Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| 5 |
| 10Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 17Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Wrexham | Statistic | Afc Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| 47% | Ball possession | 53%Lead |
| 73% | Pass accuracy | 74%Lead |
| 284 | Accurate passes | 324Lead |
| 390 | Total passes | 436Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Wrexham | Statistic | Afc Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Wrexham | Statistic | Afc Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Wrexham | Statistic | Afc Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |