Match statistics snapshot
- Grazer AK fired more attempts (12 vs 9 shots).
- WSG Wattens was more accurate in front of goal (22% on target vs 8%).
- WSG Wattens held more of the ball (59% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Wsg Wattens | Statistic | Grazer Ak |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 1 | Shots inside the box | 5Lead |
| 1 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 2Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 7 |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 12Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Wsg Wattens | Statistic | Grazer Ak |
|---|---|---|
| 59%Lead | Ball possession | 41% |
| 81%Lead | Pass accuracy | 73% |
| 397Lead | Accurate passes | 255 |
| 492Lead | Total passes | 347 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Wsg Wattens | Statistic | Grazer Ak |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Wsg Wattens | Statistic | Grazer Ak |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Wsg Wattens | Statistic | Grazer Ak |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 19 |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.