Match statistics snapshot
- WSG Wattens fired more attempts (14 vs 10 shots).
- Red Bull Salzburg was more accurate in front of goal (60% on target vs 21%).
- Red Bull Salzburg held more of the ball (55% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Wsg Wattens | Statistic | Red Bull Salzburg |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Wsg Wattens | Statistic | Red Bull Salzburg |
|---|---|---|
| 45% | Ball possession | 55%Lead |
| 63% | Pass accuracy | 71%Lead |
| 184 | Accurate passes | 272Lead |
| 294 | Total passes | 383Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Wsg Wattens | Statistic | Red Bull Salzburg |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Wsg Wattens | Statistic | Red Bull Salzburg |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Wsg Wattens | Statistic | Red Bull Salzburg |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | Fouls | 10 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |