Match statistics snapshot
- WSG Wattens created the clearer chances on xG (0.64 vs 0.31, Δ 0.33).
- WSG Wattens fired more attempts (16 vs 7 shots).
- Ried was more accurate in front of goal (29% on target vs 19%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Wsg Wattens | Statistic | Ried |
|---|---|---|
| 0.64Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.31 |
| 3 | Offsides | 3 |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 3Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 0 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Wsg Wattens | Statistic | Ried |
|---|---|---|
| 47% | Ball possession | 53%Lead |
| 68% | Pass accuracy | 70%Lead |
| 177 | Accurate passes | 215Lead |
| 262 | Total passes | 305Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Wsg Wattens | Statistic | Ried |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Wsg Wattens | Statistic | Ried |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| 0 | Goals prevented | 0 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Wsg Wattens | Statistic | Ried |
|---|---|---|
| 20 | Fouls | 16Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.