Match statistics snapshot
- Sturm Graz created the clearer chances on xG (0.55 vs 2.01, Δ 1.46).
- Sturm Graz fired more attempts (15 vs 8 shots).
- Sturm Graz was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 13%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Wsg Wattens | Statistic | Sturm Graz |
|---|---|---|
| 0.55 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.01Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 9 |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 1 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Wsg Wattens | Statistic | Sturm Graz |
|---|---|---|
| 42% | Ball possession | 58%Lead |
| 68% | Pass accuracy | 73%Lead |
| 210 | Accurate passes | 298Lead |
| 307 | Total passes | 410Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Wsg Wattens | Statistic | Sturm Graz |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Wsg Wattens | Statistic | Sturm Graz |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| -0.93 | Goals prevented | -0.93 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Wsg Wattens | Statistic | Sturm Graz |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.