Match statistics snapshot
- Wolfsberger AC was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 20%).
- Wolfsberger AC held more of the ball (54% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Wsg Wattens | Statistic | Wolfsberger Ac |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| 4 | Shots off target |
| 4 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 3Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Wsg Wattens | Statistic | Wolfsberger Ac |
|---|---|---|
| 46% | Ball possession | 54%Lead |
| 72% | Pass accuracy | 76%Lead |
| 270 | Accurate passes | 346Lead |
| 374 | Total passes | 456Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Wsg Wattens | Statistic | Wolfsberger Ac |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Wsg Wattens | Statistic | Wolfsberger Ac |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Wsg Wattens | Statistic | Wolfsberger Ac |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |