Match statistics snapshot
- Beijing Guoan created the clearer chances on xG (0.43 vs 1.69, Δ 1.26).
- Beijing Guoan fired more attempts (15 vs 7 shots).
- Wuhan Three Towns held more of the ball (55% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Wuhan Three Towns | Statistic | Beijing Guoan |
|---|---|---|
| 0.43 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.69Lead |
| 3 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 7Lead |
| 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 1 | Shots on target | 3Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 7 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Wuhan Three Towns | Statistic | Beijing Guoan |
|---|---|---|
| 55%Lead | Ball possession | 45% |
| 88%Lead | Pass accuracy | 85% |
| 429Lead | Accurate passes | 338 |
| 489Lead | Total passes | 398 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Wuhan Three Towns | Statistic | Beijing Guoan |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Wuhan Three Towns | Statistic | Beijing Guoan |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Wuhan Three Towns | Statistic | Beijing Guoan |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |