Match statistics snapshot
- Wuhan Three Towns fired more attempts (16 vs 14 shots).
- Chengdu Better City was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 31%).
- Wuhan Three Towns held more of the ball (55% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Wuhan Three Towns | Statistic | Chengdu Better City |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 13Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 8Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 5 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 14 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Wuhan Three Towns | Statistic | Chengdu Better City |
|---|---|---|
| 55%Lead | Ball possession | 45% |
| 83%Lead | Pass accuracy | 77% |
| 337Lead | Accurate passes | 243 |
| 404Lead | Total passes | 317 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Wuhan Three Towns | Statistic | Chengdu Better City |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Wuhan Three Towns | Statistic | Chengdu Better City |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Wuhan Three Towns | Statistic | Chengdu Better City |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |