Match statistics snapshot
- Hangzhou Greentown created the clearer chances on xG (0.88 vs 0.94, Δ 0.06).
- Wuhan Three Towns fired more attempts (20 vs 11 shots).
- Hangzhou Greentown was more accurate in front of goal (45% on target vs 15%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Wuhan Three Towns | Statistic | Hangzhou Greentown |
|---|---|---|
| 0.88 | Expected goals (xG) | 0.94Lead |
| 5 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots off target | 5 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 13Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 20Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Wuhan Three Towns | Statistic | Hangzhou Greentown |
|---|---|---|
| 58%Lead | Ball possession | 42% |
| 88%Lead | Pass accuracy | 82% |
| 521Lead | Accurate passes | 362 |
| 591Lead | Total passes | 440 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Wuhan Three Towns | Statistic | Hangzhou Greentown |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Wuhan Three Towns | Statistic | Hangzhou Greentown |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Wuhan Three Towns | Statistic | Hangzhou Greentown |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.