Match statistics snapshot
- Hangzhou Greentown created the clearer chances on xG (1.31 vs 3.18, Δ 1.87).
- Wuhan Three Towns held more of the ball (58% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Wuhan Three Towns | Statistic | Hangzhou Greentown |
|---|---|---|
| 1.31 | Expected goals (xG) | 3.18Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 10 | Shots inside the box | 12Lead |
| 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 5 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 16 | Total shots | 16 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Wuhan Three Towns | Statistic | Hangzhou Greentown |
|---|---|---|
| 58%Lead | Ball possession | 42% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 79% |
| 431Lead | Accurate passes | 304 |
| 515Lead | Total passes | 386 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Wuhan Three Towns | Statistic | Hangzhou Greentown |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Wuhan Three Towns | Statistic | Hangzhou Greentown |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Wuhan Three Towns | Statistic | Hangzhou Greentown |
|---|---|---|
| 14Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |