Match statistics snapshot
- Wuhan Three Towns created the clearer chances on xG (1.77 vs 0.98, Δ 0.79).
- Wuhan Three Towns fired more attempts (19 vs 16 shots).
- Meizhou Kejia was more accurate in front of goal (44% on target vs 16%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Wuhan Three Towns | Statistic | Meizhou Kejia |
|---|---|---|
| 1.77Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.98 |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 11Lead | Shots off target | 5 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 9Lead | Shots outside the box | 8 |
|---|
| 19Lead | Total shots | 16 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Wuhan Three Towns | Statistic | Meizhou Kejia |
|---|---|---|
| 59%Lead | Ball possession | 41% |
| 86%Lead | Pass accuracy | 77% |
| 378Lead | Accurate passes | 234 |
| 439Lead | Total passes | 303 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Wuhan Three Towns | Statistic | Meizhou Kejia |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | Corner kicks | 10Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Wuhan Three Towns | Statistic | Meizhou Kejia |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 6Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Wuhan Three Towns | Statistic | Meizhou Kejia |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 10 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |