Match statistics snapshot
- Wuhan Three Towns fired more attempts (13 vs 4 shots).
- Nantong Zhiyun was more accurate in front of goal (75% on target vs 31%).
- Wuhan Three Towns held more of the ball (67% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Wuhan Three Towns | Statistic | Nantong Zhiyun |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 0 |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 4 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Wuhan Three Towns | Statistic | Nantong Zhiyun |
|---|---|---|
| 67%Lead | Ball possession | 33% |
| 82%Lead | Pass accuracy | 68% |
| 418Lead | Accurate passes | 176 |
| 508Lead | Total passes | 260 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Wuhan Three Towns | Statistic | Nantong Zhiyun |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 0 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Wuhan Three Towns | Statistic | Nantong Zhiyun |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Wuhan Three Towns | Statistic | Nantong Zhiyun |
|---|---|---|
| 15Lead | Fouls | 18 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |