Match statistics snapshot
- Wuhan Three Towns created the clearer chances on xG (3.07 vs 0.90, Δ 2.17).
- Wuhan Three Towns fired more attempts (27 vs 14 shots).
- Wuhan Three Towns was more accurate in front of goal (37% on target vs 21%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Wuhan Three Towns | Statistic | Qingdao Jonoon |
|---|---|---|
| 3.07Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.90 |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 17Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 10Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 10Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 10Lead | Shots outside the box | 6 |
|---|
| 27Lead | Total shots | 14 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Wuhan Three Towns | Statistic | Qingdao Jonoon |
|---|---|---|
| 54%Lead | Ball possession | 46% |
| 87%Lead | Pass accuracy | 81% |
| 404Lead | Accurate passes | 312 |
| 462Lead | Total passes | 383 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Wuhan Three Towns | Statistic | Qingdao Jonoon |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Wuhan Three Towns | Statistic | Qingdao Jonoon |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 6 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 9Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Wuhan Three Towns | Statistic | Qingdao Jonoon |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |