Match statistics snapshot
- Wuhan Three Towns created the clearer chances on xG (2.67 vs 0.66, Δ 2.01).
- Wuhan Three Towns fired more attempts (20 vs 8 shots).
- Qingdao Jonoon was more accurate in front of goal (63% on target vs 50%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Wuhan Three Towns | Statistic | Qingdao Jonoon |
|---|---|---|
| 2.67Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.66 |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 7Lead | Shots off target | 3 |
|---|
| 10Lead | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 10Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 20Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Wuhan Three Towns | Statistic | Qingdao Jonoon |
|---|---|---|
| 56%Lead | Ball possession | 44% |
| 88%Lead | Pass accuracy | 81% |
| 449Lead | Accurate passes | 336 |
| 512Lead | Total passes | 413 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Wuhan Three Towns | Statistic | Qingdao Jonoon |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Wuhan Three Towns | Statistic | Qingdao Jonoon |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 5 | Goalkeeper saves | 8Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Wuhan Three Towns | Statistic | Qingdao Jonoon |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 13Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.