Match statistics snapshot
- Shandong Luneng created the clearer chances on xG (1.13 vs 1.50, Δ 0.37).
- Shandong Luneng fired more attempts (16 vs 10 shots).
- Shandong Luneng was more accurate in front of goal (56% on target vs 40%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Wuhan Three Towns | Statistic | Shandong Luneng |
|---|---|---|
| 1.13 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.50Lead |
| 3 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 13Lead |
| 4 | Shots off target | 4 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots on target | 9Lead |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Wuhan Three Towns | Statistic | Shandong Luneng |
|---|---|---|
| 57%Lead | Ball possession | 43% |
| 83%Lead | Pass accuracy | 77% |
| 430Lead | Accurate passes | 301 |
| 521Lead | Total passes | 393 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Wuhan Three Towns | Statistic | Shandong Luneng |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Wuhan Three Towns | Statistic | Shandong Luneng |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 7Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Wuhan Three Towns | Statistic | Shandong Luneng |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |