Match statistics snapshot
- SHANGHAI SIPG created the clearer chances on xG (1.36 vs 2.23, Δ 0.87).
- Wuhan Three Towns fired more attempts (18 vs 14 shots).
- SHANGHAI SIPG held more of the ball (60% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Wuhan Three Towns | Statistic | Shanghai Sipg |
|---|---|---|
| 1.36 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.23Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 13Lead | Shots inside the box | 10 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 6 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 18Lead | Total shots | 14 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Wuhan Three Towns | Statistic | Shanghai Sipg |
|---|---|---|
| 40% | Ball possession | 60%Lead |
| 82% | Pass accuracy | 87%Lead |
| 303 | Accurate passes | 495Lead |
| 370 | Total passes | 566Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Wuhan Three Towns | Statistic | Shanghai Sipg |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Wuhan Three Towns | Statistic | Shanghai Sipg |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 8Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Wuhan Three Towns | Statistic | Shanghai Sipg |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.