Match statistics snapshot
- Wuhan Three Towns created the clearer chances on xG (2.63 vs 0.64, Δ 1.99).
- Wuhan Three Towns fired more attempts (23 vs 5 shots).
- Shenzhen Ruby FC was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 30%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Wuhan Three Towns | Statistic | Shenzhen Ruby Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 2.63Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.64 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 17Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 11Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 23Lead | Total shots | 5 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Wuhan Three Towns | Statistic | Shenzhen Ruby Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 67%Lead | Ball possession | 33% |
| 87%Lead | Pass accuracy | 71% |
| 513Lead | Accurate passes | 211 |
| 588Lead | Total passes | 298 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Wuhan Three Towns | Statistic | Shenzhen Ruby Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Wuhan Three Towns | Statistic | Shenzhen Ruby Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Wuhan Three Towns | Statistic | Shenzhen Ruby Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.