Match statistics snapshot
- Wuhan Three Towns created the clearer chances on xG (1.57 vs 1.25, Δ 0.32).
- Sichuan Jiuniu fired more attempts (17 vs 11 shots).
- Wuhan Three Towns was more accurate in front of goal (73% on target vs 24%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Wuhan Three Towns | Statistic | Sichuan Jiuniu |
|---|---|---|
| 1.57Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.25 |
| 3 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 10 | Shots inside the box | 11Lead |
| 3 | Shots off target | 3 |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 17Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Wuhan Three Towns | Statistic | Sichuan Jiuniu |
|---|---|---|
| 40% | Ball possession | 60%Lead |
| 81% | Pass accuracy | 88%Lead |
| 251 | Accurate passes | 402Lead |
| 310 | Total passes | 459Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Wuhan Three Towns | Statistic | Sichuan Jiuniu |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Wuhan Three Towns | Statistic | Sichuan Jiuniu |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 10Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Wuhan Three Towns | Statistic | Sichuan Jiuniu |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | Fouls | 9 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.