Match statistics snapshot
- Wuhan Three Towns created the clearer chances on xG (2.22 vs 1.44, Δ 0.78).
- Wuhan Three Towns fired more attempts (13 vs 7 shots).
- Tianjin Teda was more accurate in front of goal (57% on target vs 31%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Wuhan Three Towns | Statistic | Tianjin Teda |
|---|---|---|
| 2.22Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.44 |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 5Lead | Shots off target | 1 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 0 |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Wuhan Three Towns | Statistic | Tianjin Teda |
|---|---|---|
| 52%Lead | Ball possession | 48% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 78% |
| 376Lead | Accurate passes | 323 |
| 444Lead | Total passes | 414 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Wuhan Three Towns | Statistic | Tianjin Teda |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Wuhan Three Towns | Statistic | Tianjin Teda |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Wuhan Three Towns | Statistic | Tianjin Teda |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 10 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |