Match statistics snapshot
- Wycombe created the clearer chances on xG (1.47 vs 0.77, Δ 0.70).
- Wycombe fired more attempts (13 vs 7 shots).
- Wycombe was more accurate in front of goal (54% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Wycombe | Statistic | Afc Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| 1.47Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.77 |
| 3 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 0 |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 2Lead |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Wycombe | Statistic | Afc Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| 50% | Ball possession | 50% |
| 74% | Pass accuracy | 74% |
| 299Lead | Accurate passes | 291 |
| 403Lead | Total passes | 393 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Wycombe | Statistic | Afc Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Wycombe | Statistic | Afc Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 2Lead |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Wycombe | Statistic | Afc Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.