Match statistics snapshot
- Wycombe created the clearer chances on xG (2.03 vs 0.65, Δ 1.38).
- Wycombe fired more attempts (15 vs 5 shots).
- Wycombe was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 20%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Wycombe | Statistic | Blackpool |
|---|---|---|
| 2.03Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.65 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 5 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Wycombe | Statistic | Blackpool |
|---|---|---|
| 71%Lead | Ball possession | 29% |
| 78%Lead | Pass accuracy | 52% |
| 350Lead | Accurate passes | 95 |
| 448Lead | Total passes | 184 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Wycombe | Statistic | Blackpool |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Corner kicks | 6 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Wycombe | Statistic | Blackpool |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Wycombe | Statistic | Blackpool |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |