Match statistics snapshot
- Wycombe fired more attempts (25 vs 7 shots).
- Wycombe was more accurate in front of goal (28% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Wycombe | Statistic | Cheltenham |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 3 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 16Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 10Lead | Shots off target |
| 3 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 0 |
|---|
| 9Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 25Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Wycombe | Statistic | Cheltenham |
|---|---|---|
| 51%Lead | Ball possession | 49% |
| 55%Lead | Pass accuracy | 51% |
| 175Lead | Accurate passes | 157 |
| 320Lead | Total passes | 309 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Wycombe | Statistic | Cheltenham |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 6 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Wycombe | Statistic | Cheltenham |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Wycombe | Statistic | Cheltenham |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.