Match statistics snapshot
- Wycombe fired more attempts (21 vs 6 shots).
- Wycombe was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 17%).
- Wycombe held more of the ball (74% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fulham | Statistic | Wycombe |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG)Quality of chances created — not just shot count. | ||
| OffsidesTiming of runs — high counts can mean aggressive lines. | ||
16Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
8Lead | Shots off target | 3 |
8Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
5Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
21Lead | Total shotsAll attempts including blocked and off-target. | 6 |
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fulham | Statistic | Wycombe |
|---|---|---|
74%Lead | Ball possession | 26% |
88%Lead | Pass accuracy | 68% |
544Lead | Accurate passes | 149 |
620Lead | Total passes | 218 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fulham | Statistic | Wycombe |
|---|---|---|
9Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fulham | Statistic | Wycombe |
|---|---|---|
5Lead | Blocked shotsDefensive actions — also counts as part of attacking pressure faced. | 2 |
0 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
| Goals preventedKeeper performance vs expected — positive is above average. |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fulham | Statistic | Wycombe |
|---|---|---|
6Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Scouting-style duels — each row compares both teams, shows share of the pie, and who had the edge. Categories summarize who won more signals.
How clinical and dangerous each attack was — not just how often they shot, but where and how good those chances were.
Fulham leads this block
Fulham leads shot accuracy (+129% vs Wycombe)
Fulham leads shot accuracy (+129% vs Wycombe)
Fulham leads box penetration (+52% vs Wycombe)
Playing style signals: whether chances came from patient possession or direct vertical play.
Fulham leads this block
Wycombe — slower buildup (more passes per shot)
Wycombe — slower buildup (more passes per shot)
Territorial dominance built from box presence, set pieces, and sustained threat.
Fulham leads this block
Fulham leads territorial pressure (+440% vs Wycombe)
Fulham leads territorial pressure (+440% vs Wycombe)
Archetype ratings you can map to card modifiers, AI behaviour, or match narratives.
Wycombe leads (15.0 vs 8.0).
Fulham leads (65.1 vs 17.7).
Fulham leads (25.0 vs 4.0).
Wycombe leads (15.0 vs 12.0).